Köknar, Sait AliPöğün-Zander, YükselSama GheithBerlin International University of Applied Sciences2024-01-152025-12-022025-12-022023https://repository.berlin-international.de/handle/123456789/1064AI-GENERATED ABSTRACT: Abstract: The traditional boundaries between urban and interior design, dealing with public and private spaces, respectively, have been challenged, leading to a deeper exploration of the concept of urban interiority. Urban interiority extends interior design principles to public spaces, emphasizing intimate, experiential, and human-scale aspects. The 21st-century city is described as the "intimate metropolis," reflecting the importance of designing urban spaces for individual experiences and relationships. This paper aims to explore the process of exteriorizing interiority by translating interior qualities into the exterior realm, challenging conventional design boundaries. The research adopts an in-depth qualitative approach, examining spatial, temporal, social, and aesthetic concerns to make urban spaces more user-centric and inclusive. It seeks to uncover how interior design tools and strategies can shape the urban environment to be more responsive to individual needs and experiences. The thesis is divided into three sections: spatial condition of urban interiority, temporal aspects of urban interiority, and an analysis of 10 urban spaces emphasizing interiority. The results will contribute to a framework for designing urban spaces with a focus on interiority, ultimately promoting meaningful and impactful experiences for people who use them. Keywords: urban interiority, interior design, public spaces, intimate metropolis, user-centric design, exteriorizing interiority, spatial inversion, urban room, qualitative research, temporal conditions, theoretical concepts, design frameworkMACHINE-GENERATED CONTENTS NOTE: Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................. 1 1.1 Introduction .......................................... 1 1.2 Approach and Methodology ............................ 2 2. the Spatial Condition ................................. 4 2.1 the Conditions of Interiority ........................ 4 2.2 Spreading of the Disciplinary Perspectives ......... 9 2.3 Shifting from an Urban Void to Urban Room ....... 13 3. the Temporal Condition ............................... 20 3.1 Placemaking "interior-making" ...................... 20 3.2 the Temporal Nature of Urban Interiority ........ 23 3.3 Inhabitation ............................................ 26 3.4 the Individual Vs. the Collective .................. 29 4. Study of Examples on Interior-making .............. 34 4.1 Lanternen ............................................. 35 4.2 Parley Park ........................................... 37 4.3 Enzi Möblierung ...................................... 39 4.4 Open House ........................................... 42 4.5 Place Au Changement Public Plaza ............... 44 4.6 Bmw Guggenheim Lab .............................. 47 4.7 Stadtloounge ......................................... 49 4.8 Playground Fence .................................... 51 4.9 the Stadtküche (city Kitchen) ................... 53 4.10 Trh Market Stalls .................................. 55 4.11 Findings ............................................. 57 5. Thesis Project ............................................ 62 5.1 the Site .............................................. 62 5.2 the Concept ......................................... 65 6. Conclusion .................................................. 74 bibliography ................................................... 78 list of Figures ................................................. 80engExteriorizing InteriorityInterior DesignIntimate MetropolisPublic SpacesSpatial InversionTemporal ConditionsTheoretical ConceptsUrban RoomUser-Centric DesignUrban InterioritySpatial Inversion : Exploring Dialectical Relationship Between Urban Space and Interiority, and Its Impact on Individual ExperiencesThesis